This panel will explore the place of impact assessment within the project lifecycle. It will explore the various stages from identification of project needs to project delivery by considering design choices, risk management, and implementation strategies. The panelists will consider the optimization of assessment in the context of the lifecycle.
1(A) - Before the Assessment: Land Relationship Visioning at Project Inception
Critical project decisions are often made before formal environmental assessments begin. This session will introduce Land Relationship Visioning, a First Nations-informed planning approach that allows stakeholders to explore project relationships with the land and local communities before key decisions become fixed.
Drawing on CIPS' experience, the session will provide a structured method combining First Nations perspectives, place-based knowledge, and dialogue to identify significant values, risks, and desired outcomes early in the lifecycle. Participants will examine common pitfalls, such as beginning with predetermined solutions or engaging communities too late.
1(B) - Laying the Groundwork: Early Engagement on Canada's First High-Speed Rail
Major infrastructure projects are often shaped long before formal assessments begin. This presentation explores how early relationship-building, collaborative problem-solving, and informed planning can influence project outcomes, reduce risk, and support more sustainable decision-making.
Alto, a federal Crown corporation, is in the early stages of planning Canada’s first high-speed rail network between Toronto and Québec City. Building on a recently signed Memorandum of Understanding between Alto and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, presenters will discuss how both organizations are working together to integrate environmental considerations into the early stages of project planning.
1(C) - Trade Offs & Outcomes: How Criteria Weights Result in Tangible Routing Differences
Linear infrastructure design is fundamentally a game of trade-offs played out across a landscape. Choosing whether to cut through a pristine greenfield to the east or acquire private residential properties to the west represents a critical decision-making juncture. While environmental assessment practitioners recognize the value of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) when evaluating fully developed routes, the foundational assumptions made before those routes even exist often escape rigorous scrutiny.
This presentation explores the impact of pre-assessment decision-making using advanced routing technology and MCDA modeling and will involve interactive audience participation.
1(D) - Open Science and Data in an Evolving Regulatory Environment
As Canada works to unlock investment, strengthen sovereignty, and demonstrate its ability to build at pace while respecting environmental and reconciliation commitments, there is increasing pressure to identify efficiencies in regulatory processes. At the same time, regulatory decisions face heightened scrutiny and increasingly diverse stakeholder expectations. Effective and inclusive science communication is therefore essential to support credible and transparent impact assessment processes.
This session will demonstrate the functionality of the Government of Canada's Open Science and Data Platform as an example of digital innovation that can help streamline and accelerate major project reviews.
1(E) - Building Faster? The Impact Assessment Landscape in an Era of Project Acceleration
Canada is pursuing an ambitious agenda to accelerate major infrastructure, energy, mining and resource development projects. At both the federal and provincial levels, initiatives aimed at reducing regulatory burden, shortening approval timelines and eliminating perceived duplication are driving changes to impact assessment processes. This presentation will examine how the evolving mandate to "build faster" is altering the practice of impact assessment under the federal Impact Assessment Act.
The Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) will provide an update on its ongoing efforts to modernize Ontario's environmental assessment program and advance a faster, simpler, and smarter framework. The session will highlight key initiatives, including improvements to the Comprehensive Environmental Assessment process. Attendees will also receive an overview of the new Streamlined Environmental Assessment for Municipal Infrastructure, which comes into effect in January 2027.
2(B) - Impact Assessment in an Era of Resource Development & Co-operative Federalism
Drawing on experience from major projects, panelists will discuss how effective IA creates value before regulatory decisions are made. Well-designed assessment processes can improve project design, identify and manage risks, strengthen relationships with rights holders and stakeholders, support adaptive management, and contribute to better long-term outcomes. Rather than asking how assessments can simply be streamlined, this panel will explore how they can be designed more intelligently to gain efficiencies from processes that are coherent, well-scoped, collaborative, and grounded in lived experience. The opportunity now is to build an IA system that is lighter where it should be, stronger where it must be, and ultimately more resilient for the peoples and environments it is meant to safeguard.
3(A) - Making Impact Assessments Work: Reflections on Process, Priorities, & Practice
As impact assessment practice continues to evolve, practitioners are increasingly challenged to balance rigorous analysis with efficient, focused processes that meet the needs of regulators, proponents, Indigenous communities, and other participants.
3(B) - Duty to Consult: From Legal Duty to Meaningful Practice
This interactive workshop will explore what the Duty to Consult is, when it applies, and how it is carried out in practice. It will consider the roles, responsibilities, and perspectives of the Crown, Indigenous communities, proponents, stakeholders, and practitioners involved in the consultation process. The sessions will explore lessons learned, challenges, and opportunities.
This panel will explore the place of impact assessment within the project lifecycle. It will explore the various stages from identification of project needs to project delivery by considering design choices, risk management, and implementation strategies. The panelists will consider the optimization of assessment in the context of the lifecycle.
This panel will explore the pivotal first five years of an environmental professional's career. Early career professionals will share their firsthand experiences navigating a rapidly changing work environment and the critical role of emerging technologies in day-to-day operations.
6(A) - Building the IA Practitioner Toolbox: Practical Lessons for Better Assessments
This interactive workshop is designed to create a space to learn from one another and collaboratively develop a toolbox of practical approaches that can support more effective impact assessment practice. Drawing on real-world experiences from participants representing different roles and perspectives, the session will explore what strategies have worked, what have not, and what opportunities exist to improve how assessments and approvals are planned, coordinated, and implemented.
6(B) - Speed Without Shortcuts: Streamlining Ontario Impact Assessment While Keeping Rigor
This interactive session will explore practical approaches for streamlining impact assessment without compromising quality. Through audience polling, facilitated discussion, and practitioner experience, participants will identify common sources of delay, examine where streamlining has succeeded or failed, and discuss practical strategies for improving assessment outcomes in Ontario.
The session will focus on where assessments commonly lose time, where early project decisions create downstream complexity, and where attempts to accelerate work can weaken trust, engagement quality, or implementation. Participants will reflect on what has worked, what has failed, and what course corrections improved outcomes.
5(B) - Impact Assessment for Renewable Energy Deployment: Burdens, Benefits, Expectations
As Canada accelerates the deployment of offshore wind generation and expands critical transmission infrastructure, environmental assessments must evolve beyond regulatory compliance to become an adaptive, life-cycle based process that supports the successful delivery of a project. While High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) systems can offer technical and economic advantages for long-distance power transmission, HVDC submarine transmission projects present unique technical, environmental, stakeholder, and constructability challenges that require integrated planning from routing and siting through construction to operation.
This presentation will highlight lessons learned to reduce project risk, improve environmental outcomes, engage stakeholders, communities and Indigenous partners, and enhance schedule and cost certainty for High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) submarine transmission projects.
5(C) - Beyond Approval: Lessons from HVDC Submarine Projects for Next-Gen Infrastructure
Ontario’s free-entry mining system allows prospectors to stake mineral claims on Indigenous territories with minimal oversight and no prior consultation. Once staked, these claims grant exclusive exploration rights—often in ways that physically disturb culturally and ecologically significant areas. The duty to consult First Nations is triggered only when prospectors apply for a mineral exploration permit. This presentation will highlight, as illustrated in the Mineral Tracker developed by Wildlife Conservation Society Canada, challenges with these practices in high-activity regions like the Ring of Fire due to the volume of exploration notifications requiring review by Indigenous communities of the implications to continued traditional uses and cultural practices.
7(A) - Health in Action: Health-Based Mitigation and Monitoring in Impact Assessment
Drawing on recent project experience in Ontario, this presentation explores how health is increasingly being embedded into mitigation and monitoring frameworks in IA. Examples include the integration of health-based benchmarks into air quality, surface water and aquatic environmental monitoring programs, work camp measures (e.g., dry camp policies, on-site health services, support for land-based activities), health surveys, and community-oriented approaches such as participation in monitoring programs, environmental data sharing, and multi-stakeholder management committees.
8(A) - Lifecycle Planning for Waste Management Facilities - Beyond the Initial Assessment
Ontario has been on the cusp of a crisis for available waste disposal and waste processing capacity for many years. Of all municipal infrastructure, waste management facilities are some of the hardest to successfully steer through the impact assessment and permitting process. One of the most critical issues to address in siting and permitting for these facilities are land use conflicts, and the acceptance (or lack thereof) of these facilities within the community. Our case studies will demonstrate that effective long-term planning that extends beyond the initial facility lifespan of 20 to 25 years, can set the stage for successful future environmental assessments so that this infrastructure can be renewed and support community growth beyond the initial approval.
7(B) - Lessons Learned: Translating Environmental Assessment Commitments into Construction Practice
Environmental assessments often culminate in a series of commitments intended to avoid, mitigate, or manage potential environmental effects. While significant effort is devoted to developing these commitments during the assessment process, considerably less attention is given to what happens after project approval and during implementation of the project; It is during detailed design and construction that these commitments are put to the test. The success of an EA is ultimately measured not by the commitments documented in approval reports, but by how effectively they are implemented and whether they achieve the intended outcomes.
The session will highlight common challenges associated with commitment management, including maintaining accountability across long project timelines, ensuring commitments remain visible through project transitions, and balancing environmental requirements with evolving project needs.
8(B) - From Rock to Reclamation: The Aggregate Lifecycle in Practice
Aggregate extraction licensing projects are uniquely positioned to illustrate the full lifecycle of impact assessment—from early land use planning decisions to long-term site rehabilitation and post-closure outcomes.
This panel discussion brings together three complementary perspectives including a planner, an ecologist, and a producer to explore how lifecycle thinking can be meaningfully applied across the aggregate sector.
This panel will examine how the 2026 OAIA Conference was able to consider the full lifecycle of a project and how assessments can be a tool for shaping resilient, implementable, and outcome-driven projects.